Abstract
We determined the relationship between the histopathological findings of the placental bed and Doppler flow measurements of the uterine artery in women with preeclampsia and fetal growth retardation. Doppler velocimetry in the uterine artery was evaluated in 17 pregnant women with preeclampsia, 15 of whom had fetal growth retardation, and 20 normal pregnant women, within 14 days of Caesarean delivery and placental bed biopsy. The placental bed biopsies were evaluated in terms of trophoblast migration into the myometrium and physiological changes of the spiral arteries. The results were compared with Doppler velocimetry values. Trophoblast migration and physiological changes were not detected in 10 (59%) cases with preeclampsia and in 4 (20%) with normal pregnancies (p<0.05). In the preeclamptic group, 9 of 15 cases that were complicated with intrauterine growth retardation had no trophoblastic migration into the myometrium. The mean systolic/diastolic ratio, resistance index and pulsatility index of the uterine artery in women with preeclampsia and fetal growth retardation was significantly higher than women with normal pregnancies (p<0.01). The mean resistance index of the uterine artery in the impaired migration group was significantly higher than the migration group (p=0.02). The incidence of impaired trophoblast migration was significantly higher in the group with a high systolic/diastolic ratio (above 2.5) and resistance index (above 0.58) than cases with low systolic/diastolic ratio and resistance index (72%, 23% respectively, p<0.05). The incidence of early diastolic notch in the impaired trophoblast migration group was significantly higher than the migration group (57% versus 13%, p<0.01). Our study supports the hypothesis that high uterine artery flow resistance is related to the reduced trophoblast migration into the myometrium and inadequate physiological changes in the spiral arteries in women with intrauterine growth retardation and preeclampsia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.