The comparison of the watertight and non-watertight dural closure in supratentorial craniotomy: A single-institute 10-year experience with 698 patients.

Abstract

Watertight dural closure (WTDC) is considered crucial by many neurosurgeons in cranial base surgery, infratentorial craniotomy, and spinal intradural procedure. Whether WTDC also reduce complications remains controversial in supratentorial craniotomy. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between WTDC and CSF-related complications in supratentorial craniotomy for the resection of space-occupying lesions. A retrospective analysis of patients who suffered from intracranial space-occupying lesions at Beijing Ditan Hospital between January 2011 and December 2021 was conducted. A total of 698 cases were reviewed with attention to the operative approach, subgaleal fluid collection, wound healing impairment, postoperative infection, and post-craniotomy headaches. The study included a total of 423 patients with WTDC and 275 patients without WTDC. Patients without WTDC had a significantly higher rate of infection (10.9% vs 4.5% with WTDC, P = .001). The rate of subgaleal fluid collection was 9.7% in the WTDC group and 11.3% in the non-WTDC group, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .502). They suffered from a greater incidence of post-craniotomy headaches in the WTDC group (13.5% vs 9.5% in the non-WTDC group), but without statistical significance (P = .109). We also found no difference in wound healing impairment (P = .719). There is less postoperative infection associated with WTDC during intracranial space-occupying lesion removal than without WTDC in supratentorial craniotomy.