Abstract
Objective: To compare functional outcomes in terms of INPGHS score and overall improvement in patients of iNPH treated with ETV vs. VP shunting. Materials & Methods: A Randomized control trial was conducted for 6 months at the Department of Neurosurgery, Rawalpindi Medical University and Allied Hospitals, Rawalpindi. 62 patients (31 in each group) were enrolled & allocated into two groups. In group A patients ETV was done and in group B VP shunting. Post-operatively, Patients were followed up for 1 month. Results: The mean age of the patients in the ETV & VP shunting groups was 63.19 ± 6.95 & 63 ± 6.82 years respectively. Males were 64.5% (n = 20) in both groups. Improvement was noted in 9 (29%) patients in the ETV group & 15 (48.4%) patients in the latter group (p-value = 0.118). Conclusion: Ventriculoperitoneal shunts are superior to endoscopic third ventriculostomy in terms of functional neurological outcomes and improvement in symptoms. Keywords: Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy, Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt, Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Grading Scale (iNPHGS), Aqueductal CSF Stroke Volume (ACSV).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
