The compared costs of domination, location-domination and identification

Abstract

Let G = (V, E) be a finite graph and r ≥ 1 be an integer. For v ∈ V , let B r (v) = {x ∈ V : d(v, x) ≤ r} be the ball of radius r centered at v. A set C ⊆ V is an r-dominating code if for all v ∈ V , we have B r (v) ∩ C = ∅; it is an r-locating-dominating code if for all v ∈ V , we have B r (v) ∩ C = ∅, and for any two distinct non-codewords x ∈ V C, y ∈ V C, we have B r (x) ∩ C = B r (y) ∩ C; it is an r-identifying code if for all v ∈ V , we have B r (v) ∩ C = ∅, and for any two distinct vertices x ∈ V , y ∈ V , we have B r (x) ∩ C = B r (y) ∩ C. We denote by γ r (G) (respectively, ld r (G) and id r (G)) the smallest possible cardinality of an r-dominating code (respectively, an r-locating-dominating code and an r-identifying code). We study how small and how large the three differences id r (G)−ld r (G), id r (G)−γ r (G) and ld r (G) − γ r (G) can be.