Abstract

Photochemical treatment is increasingly being applied to remedy environmental problems. TiO2-derived catalysts are efficiently and widely used in photodegradation applications. The efficiency of various photochemical treatments, namely, the use of UV irradiation without catalyst or with TiO2/graphene-TiO2 photodegradation methods was determined by comparing the photodegadation of two main types of hydrophobic chlorinated aromatic pollutants, namely, pentachlorophenol (PCP) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Results show that photodegradation in methanol solution under pure UV irradiation was more efficient than that with either one of the catalysts tested, contrary to previous results in which photodegradation rates were enhanced using TiO2-derived catalysts. The effects of various factors, such as UV light illumination, addition of methanol to the solution, catalyst dosage, and the pH of the reaction mixture, were examined. The degradation pathway was deduced. The photochemical treatment in methanol soil washing solution did not benefit from the use of the catalysts tested. Pure UV irradiation was sufficient for the dechlorination and degradation of the PCP and PCBs.

Highlights

  • Hydrophobic chlorinated aromatic pollutants, such as pentachlorophenol (PCP) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), are among the most important environmental pollutants in the twentieth century

  • Among all the remediation technologies, soil washing combined with photochemical treatments has become increasingly advantageous because this method does not release toxic by-products into the environment and the cost is reasonable [7]

  • The target contaminant can be extracted from the soil by a soil washing solvent, and the following photocatalytic degradation can be altered with different soil washing solvents [8,9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydrophobic chlorinated aromatic pollutants, such as pentachlorophenol (PCP) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), are among the most important environmental pollutants in the twentieth century. For several decades after their commercial production, these compounds had been widely used for numerous applications, such as in wood protection, pesticides, and dielectric fluids in capacitors and transformers, before their global biota accumulation and genotoxic activity were gradually noticed [1]. Given their potential health hazard for humans and wildlife, the Stockholm Convention in 2001 classified PCP and PCBs as Persistent Organic Pollutants. Various remediation technologies have been developed because of the extremely slow natural degradation of these compounds [4] Some of these techniques are based on a ‘‘dig and dump approach,’’ such as landfilling or capping. During UV irradiation, NOH can be formed from water molecules or other highly reactive solvents, initiating the decomposition of the pollutants [13]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.