The comparative performance of seismic response spectrum combination rules in building analysis

Abstract

AbstractThe peak dynamic responses of two mathematical models of a fifteen‐storey steel moment resisting frame building subjected to three earthquake excitations are computed by the response spectrum and time history methods. The models examined are: a ‘regular’ building in which the centres of stiffness and mass are coincident resulting in uncoupled modes with well‐separated periods in each component direction of response; and an ‘irregular’ building with the mass offset from the stiffness centre of the building causing coupled modes with the translational modes having closely spaced periods. Four response spectrum modal combination rules are discussed and are used to predict the peak responses: (1) the square root of the sum of the squares (SRSS) method; (2) the double sum combination (DSC) method; (3) the complete quadratic combination (CQC) method; and (4) the absolute sum (ABS) method. The response spectrum results are compared to the corresponding peak time history values to evaluate the accuracy of the different combination rules. The DSC and the CQC methods provide good peak response estimates for both the regular and irregular building models. The SRSS method provides good peak response estimates for the regular building, but yields significant errors in the irregular building response estimates. The poor accuracy in the irregular building results is attributable to the effects of coupled modes with closely spaced periods. It is concluded that the DSC and CQC methods produce response estimates of equivalent accuracy. Both methods are recommended for general use. In addition to the DSC and CQC rules, the SRSS method is recommended for systems where coupled modes with closely spaced periods do not dominate the response.