Abstract
This article gives the analysis of five curriculums on Botany for the last ten years that have been carried out at Kremenets Regional Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy named after Taras Shevchenko (2008 – “Botany”, 2012 – “Anatomy and Plant Morphology”, “Plant Systematics” and “Mycology”, 2016 – “Botany”). The comparison of such structural elements of the curriculum as the content, the number of lecture and laboratory work hours, the number of independent and individual work hours and the kind of control is described. The distribution of hours by sections and topics is considered. The compulsory learning outcomes are formed into groups such as the requirements for students' knowledge and skills, as well as the purpose, tasks, methodological support and recommended literature for all curriculums. It is proposed to introduce separate educational disciplines such as "Mycology" and "Theology" in the curriculum of the students-future Biology teachers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
