Abstract
This chapter reviews the conceptual and methodological difficulties in the field of comparative administrative law. It seeks to present a new and different conceptual and practical tool for the study of comparative administrative law (CAL). This suggested methodology is based on using a common real-life reference point such as McDonald’s branches, and testing the ways in which various legal regimes apply to them in each and every different legal system. The chapter first presents the various difficulties and fallacies of current CAL research. It then demonstrates the proposed methodology and discusses its potential, as well as some constraints and problems that should be taken into account. The chapter concludes by inviting the community of comparative public lawyers to join the project of mapping the field of CAL and developing a new common legal language that would enable everyone to benefit from comparative legal research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
