The combination of two semen preparation techniques (glass wool filtration and swim-up) and their effect on the morphology of recovered spermatozoa and outcome of IVF-ET.

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to relate sperm quality, especially sperm morphology, to the outcome of IVF results, when glass wool filtration (GWF) and swim-up were used in combination for the preparation of spermatozoa. A total of 60 ejaculates were analysed. GWF was compared with glass wool filtration/swim-up (GWF-SU) by using aliquots from the same semen samples to increase the precision of the comparison and to establish the cumulative effect of these two semen preparation methods on the morphology of the recovered spermatozoa. Sperm parameters were examined in native semen, in semen preparation samples after GWF and GWF-SU. The mean percentages for motility, morphology and velocity were improved significantly over those in fresh semen only when GWF-SU was used. GWF alone resulted only in a significantly higher recovery of motile spermatozoa. In semen preparation, 10% of spermatozoa with normal morphology appeared to be the cut-off point as there was a significantly higher recovery in fresh semen samples containing > 10% morphologically normal spermatozoa after GWF-SU. Outcome of IVF-ET following preparation with GWF-SU showed better results in comparison to the swim-up procedure alone, though this difference was not statistically significant. The cut-off point was also > 10% morphologically normal spermatozoa. Improvement in all aspects of IVF-ET occurred when native semen contained > 10% morphologically normal spermatozoa. It is concluded that GWF alone did not produce significantly better results but, in combination with swim-up, it resulted in significantly better sperm morphology and in an improved outcome of IVF-ET for fresh semen samples with > 10% morphologically normal spermatozoa.