Abstract

Colorectal surgeons regularly make the decision to anastomose, defunction or form an end colostomy when performing rectal surgery. This study aimed to define personality traits of colorectal surgeons and explore any influence of such traits on the decision to perform a rectal anastomosis. Fifty attendees of The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 2016 Conference participated. After written consent, all underwent personality testing: alexithymia (inability to understand emotions), type of thinking process (intuitive versus rational) and personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, openness, emotional stability, conscientiousness). Questions were answered regarding anastomotic decisions in various clinical scenarios and results analysed to reveal any influence of the surgeon's personality on anastomotic decision. Participants were: male (86%), consultants (84%) and based in England (68%). Alexithymia was low (4%) with 81% displaying intuitive thinking (reflex, fast). Participants scored higher in emotional stability (ability to remain calm) and conscientiousness (organized, methodical) compared with population norms. Personality traits influenced the next anastomotic decision if: surgeons had recently received criticism at a departmental audit meeting; were operating with an anaesthetist that was not their regular one; or there had been no anastomotic leaks in their patients for over 1 year. Colorectal surgeons have speciality relevant personalities that potentially influence the important decision to anastomose and could explain the variation in surgical practice across the UK. Future work should explore these findings in other countries and any link of personality traits to patient-related outcomes.

Highlights

  • In colorectal surgery, rectal anastomotic leakage is the single greatest risk factor for perioperative mortality leading to poorer long-term oncological outcomes and quality of life [1,2,3,4]

  • Personality traits influenced the anastomotic decision if: surgeons had recently received criticism at a departmental audit meeting; were operating with an anaesthetist that was not their regular one; or there had been no anastomotic leaks in their patients for over 1 year

  • Future work should explore these findings in other countries and any link of personality traits to patient-related outcomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rectal anastomotic leakage is the single greatest risk factor for perioperative mortality leading to poorer long-term oncological outcomes and quality of life [1,2,3,4]. Heuristics in surgery is a growing academic area striving to identify biases, situational factors and personality traits that are unrelated to patient characteristics. Such insights are desirable to ensure that predictable flaws or biases are identified, acknowledged and subsequently modified to prevent flawed decisionmaking and improve outcomes; the published work on heuristics in prevention of major bile duct injury during cholecystectomy is an example [10,11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call