Abstract

The plane-of-satellites problem is one of the most severe small-scale challenges for the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model: Several dwarf galaxies around the Milky Way and Andromeda co-orbit in thin, planar structures. A similar case has been identified around the nearby elliptical galaxy Centaurus A (Cen A). In this Letter, we study the satellite system of Cen A, adding twelve new galaxies with line-of-sight velocities from VLT/MUSE observations. We find that 21 out of 28 dwarf galaxies with measured velocities share a coherent motion. Similarly, flattened and coherently moving structures are found only in 0.2% of Cen A analogs in the Illustris-TNG100 cosmological simulation, independently of whether we use its dark-matter-only or hydrodynamical run. These analogs are not co-orbiting, and they arise only by chance projection, thus they are short-lived structures in such simulations. Our findings indicate that the observed co-rotating planes of satellites are a persistent challenge for ΛCDM, which is largely independent from baryon physics.

Highlights

  • One of the main challenges for current models of galaxy formation is the plane-of-satellites problem (Pawlowski 2018)

  • Our findings indicate that the observed co-rotating planes of satellites are a persistent challenge for Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM), which is largely independent from baryon physics

  • In Müller et al (2021), we present spectroscopy taken with the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) mounted at the Very Large Telescope (VLT) of 12 additional dwarf galaxies around Centaurus A (Cen A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the main challenges for current models of galaxy formation is the plane-of-satellites problem (Pawlowski 2018). Kroupa et al (2005) pointed out that the flattened spatial distribution of the known eleven Milky Way satellites – a feature which was essentially discovered 40 years earlier – is incompatible with the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model of structure formation, which predicts nearly isotropic satellite distributions. This conclusion was met with several rebuttals (e.g., Zentner et al 2005; Libeskind et al 2005, 2009), showing that a certain degree. We use them to test our previous assessment of a co-rotating plane-ofsatellites around Cen A

The Cen A satellite system
Comparison to cosmological expectations
Simulated Cen A analogs and mock satellite systems
Frequency of Cen A analogs in simulations
Properties of identified analogs
Findings
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call