Abstract

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) is the carbon-fixing enzyme present in most photosynthetic organisms, converting CO2 into organic matter. Globally, photosynthetic efficiency in terrestrial plants has become increasingly challenged in recent decades due to a rapid increase in atmospheric CO2 and associated changes toward warmer and dryer environments. Well adapted for these new climatic conditions, the C4 photosynthetic pathway utilizes carbon concentrating mechanisms to increase CO2 concentrations surrounding RuBisCO, suppressing photorespiration from the oxygenase catalyzed reaction with O2. The energy efficiency of C3 photosynthesis, from which the C4 pathway evolved, is thought to rely critically on an uninterrupted supply of chloroplast CO2. Part of the homeostatic mechanism that maintains this constancy of supply involves the CO2 produced as a byproduct of photorespiration in a negative feedback loop. Analyzing the database of RuBisCO kinetic parameters, we suggest that in genera (Flaveria and Panicum) for which both C3 and C4 examples are available, the C4 pathway evolved only from C3 ancestors possessing much lower than the average carboxylase specificity relative to that of the oxygenase reaction (SC/O=SC/SO), and hence, the higher CO2 levels required for development of the photorespiratory CO2 pump (C2 photosynthesis) essential in the initial stages of C4 evolution, while in the later stage (final optimization phase in the Flaveria model) increased CO2 turnover may have occurred, which would have been supported by the higher CO2 levels. Otherwise, C4 RuBisCO kinetic traits remain little changed from the ancestral C3 species. At the opposite end of the spectrum, C3 plants (from Limonium) with higher than average SC/O, which may be associated with the ability of increased CO2, relative to O2, affinity to offset reduced photorespiration and chloroplast CO2 levels, can tolerate high stress environments. It is suggested that, instead of inherently constrained by its kinetic mechanism, RuBisCO possesses the extensive kinetic plasticity necessary for adaptation to changes in photorespiration that occur in the homeostatic regulation of CO2 supply under a broad range of abiotic environmental conditions.

Highlights

  • What makes Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/ oxygenase (RuBisCO) kinetic parameters the way they are? This question has persisted for several decades, without a definitive explanation

  • Other studies have examined the coevolution of RuBisCO kinetics and carbon concentrating mechanism (CCMs) (Goudet et al, 2020; Iñiguez et al, 2020)

  • Considering the current understanding of C4 evolution has been achieved through a broad multidisciplinary approach (Sage et al, 2018), it is noteworthy that the numbers of published RuBisCO kinetic studies over the last decade have shown a steep decline (Hanson, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

What makes Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/ oxygenase (RuBisCO) kinetic parameters the way they are? This question has persisted for several decades, without a definitive explanation. The possibility of enhancing photosynthesis by improving RuBisCO kinetic traits has been given due consideration (Whitney et al, 2011; Sharwood et al, 2016; Gomez-Fernandez et al, 2018; Wilson et al, 2018; Zhou and Whitney, 2019; Davidi et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2020; Bouvier et al, 2021), a conclusive picture of RuBisCO’s molecular mechanism (Cleland et al, 1998; Tcherkez, 2013, 2015; Cummins et al, 2018b, 2019b; Kannappan et al, 2019; Bathellier et al, 2020; Cummins and Gready, 2020) and a general consensus understanding of the observed tradeoffs between RuBisCO’s kinetic parameters remains elusive, despite having been analyzed in varying ways with the objective of gaining insights into the possible connection between evolutionary and biochemical (or catalytic) constraints (Bouvier et al, 2021). Other studies have examined the coevolution of RuBisCO kinetics and carbon concentrating mechanism (CCMs) (Goudet et al, 2020; Iñiguez et al, 2020)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call