Abstract

Patterns of co-occurrence of species are widely used to assess the fit of ecological neutral models to empirical patterns. The mathematically equivalent patterns of co-diversity of sites, in contrast, have been considered only indirectly and analyses normally are focused on the spatial distribution of species richness, rather than on the patterns of species sharing. Here we use two analytical tools (range-diversity plots and rank plots) to assess the predictions of simple neutral models in relation to patterns of co-occurrence and co-diversity. Whereas a fully stochastic null model predicts zero average among species and among sites, neutral models generate systems with low levels of covariance among species and high levels of positive covariance among sites. These patterns vary with different combinations of dispersal and speciation rates, but are always linked to the shape, symmetry, and spread of the range-size and species-richness frequency distributions. Non-homogeneous patterns of diversity and distribution arise in neutral models because of the spatial arrangement of sites and their concomitant similarity, which is reflected also in the spread of the range-size frequency distribution. The nearly null covariance among species, in contrast, implies low variance in species richness of sites and very slim frequency distributions. In real world assemblages of Mexican volant and non-volant mammals, patterns of range-size and species-richness frequency distribution are similar to those generated by neutral models. However, when the comparison includes the covariance both for species (co-occurrence) and for sites (co-diversity), empirical patterns differ significantly from the predictions of neutral models. Because of the mathematical links between the covariance in the distribution of species and the variance of species-richness values and between the covariance in species sharing among sites and the variance of range-size values, a full understanding of patterns of diversity calls for the simultaneous analysis of co-occurrence and co-diversity.

Highlights

  • Heterogeneity in the distribution of species and their diversity is one of the most obvious patterns in macroecology

  • Initial conditions The random allocation of 8,500 individuals to 143 species and 256 sites generated a presence-absence matrix with low fill (f à ~0:207) which implied that mean range size was 20.7% of the cells (n~53:04) and average species richness was 20.7% of species (s~29:63)

  • Neutral models The extreme case with no speciation (v~0:0) and no dispersal (m~0:0) yielded systems with the 136 species having very small ranges, producing presence-absence matrices with very low fill (f à ~0:013), meaning that on average only 1.3% of species occurred in a given cell and 1.3% of sites were included in the range of a given species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heterogeneity in the distribution of species and their diversity is one of the most obvious patterns in macroecology. By studying spatial and temporal patterns in the distribution of species, biologists try to understand the mechanisms that generate and maintain biological diversity at different spatial and temporal scales [1]. Intrinsic differences among species should contribute to higher levels of diversity. If species have different demographic traits, dispersal capabilities, and habitat requirements, those differences inevitably lead to variation in the size and structure of their ranges, and to a concomitant heterogeneity in the distribution of diversity. An important body of research in ecology is aimed at examining differences among species to understand patterns of co-occurrence, and patterns in the distribution of diversity [2,3]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call