Abstract
This chapter discusses the correspondence between psychological theories of cognitive closure and social identity theories of partisanship that leads to the alternative expectation that closed minds may be attracted to extreme political preferences. The chapter provides a theoretical framework to confirm whether the conflict in the US is a battle between parties that are psychologically different. It also uses the construct of the need for cognitive closure on assertions that extremists of all types are similar in some way. The chapter highlights ideas that allow an integrative statement about the political psychology of closed minds and partisan groupcentrism in US politics. It covers the individual differences in the need for cognitive closure, variation in the internal cohesiveness and polarization of the political parties, and individual and contextual differences in political attention.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.