The clinical utility of the pain assessment tool in ventilated, sedated, and muscle-relaxed neonates

Abstract

BackgroundThe neonatal Pain Assessment Tool (PAT) is considered a reliable and valid tool for assessing neonatal pain. No research has been conducted on the clinical utility of the PAT when assessing pain in ventilated, sedated, and muscle-relaxed neonates. ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to determine the clinical utility of the PAT when assessing pain in ventilated, sedated, and muscle-relaxed neonates. MethodsNeonatal nurses from the Royal Children's Hospital completed online surveys to assess the clinical utility of the PAT. Three focus groups were then conducted to further explore the variation of pain scores from the survey and clarify the challenges in interpreting the pain score. ResultsNurses perceived the PAT clinically useful in neonates who were ventilated and minimally sedated. However, the PAT was not clinically useful in neonates who were ventilated and heavily sedated or muscle-relaxed. Further exploration via focus groups highlighted two themes related to the ‘variation in the timing of the pain score’ and the ‘integration of critical thinking and judgement’ used when assessing pain in neonates. ConclusionsThe clinical utility of the PAT is acceptable for minimally sedated neonates; however, it decreases the more sedated a neonate becomes, and the PAT's usefulness is extremely poor in the muscle-relaxed neonate. A better understanding of the timing and interpretation of the pain score in relation to the neonate's clinical status may enable improved decision-making and pain management. The PAT requires further validity, reliability, and clinical utility research, particularly in critically ill and muscle-relaxed neonates.