The clinical trial on the safety and effectiveness of the photodynamic diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer using fluorescent light-guided cystoscopy after oral administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the utility and safety of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) after oral administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) (ALA-PDD) of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) using fluorescent-light (FL)-cystoscopy. MethodsThe study was a single-arm, open-label, multi-center prospective study on ALA-PDD of NMIBC, with safety as the primary endpoint and efficacy as the secondary endpoint. Diagnostic potential was evaluated through comparisons with the conventional diagnostic method using a white-light (WL)-source. Clinically recommended doses were also examined. Oral administration of 5-ALA (1.0g/50mL) was performed 180–240min before FL-cystoscopy, and positive or negative results were judged using a WL-source and based on presence or absence of red fluorescence on exposure to a blue FL-source. ResultsRegarding safety, the adverse drug reactions were observed as grade 1 pruritus in 1 patient (0.6%). As for efficacy, specificity and positive predictability were lower than those of a WL-source, but sensitivity was higher with a FL-source than with a WL-source. The proportion of patients with tumors detected only by FL-cystoscopy was greater than the proportion of patients with tumors detected only by conventional WL-cystoscopy. Moreover, not only sensitivity, but also the proportion of patients with tumors detected only by FL-cystoscopy, was highest among patients who received 5-ALA at ≧20mg/kg/body. ConclusionsALA-PDD was shown to be safe and effective. Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy of PDD increased with increased dose of 5-ALA, and the recommended dose was determined as ≧20mg/kg/body in the present study.