Abstract
Abstract 1387▪▪This icon denotes a clinically relevant abstractmiR-155 is upregulated in aggressive subtypes of solid tumors and leukemia. In AML, higher miR-155 expression is associated with FLT3-ITD. However, whether miR-155 upregulation impacts on clinical outcome independently from FLT3-ITD and other prognosticators is unknown. We evaluated the prognostic impact of miR-155 in 363 CN-AML pts (153 age <60 y; 210 age ≥60 y) that were treated with cytarabine-daunorubicin-based regimens and had a median follow-up of 7.9 y (range, 2.3–12.9). miR-155 levels were measured in pretreatment marrow or blood by the NanoString nCounter assay quantifying expression of the encoding gene MIR155HG; other molecular markers were assessed centrally. High miR-155 expressers (miR-155) had higher WBC (P<.001) and were more often FLT3-ITD-positive (pos; P<.001), RUNX1-mutated (mut; <.001), WT1-mut (P=.03), ↑ ERG (P=.02) and ↑ BAALC (P=.002), and less often CEBPA-mut (P=.003), IDH2-mut (P=.004) and FLT3-TKD-pos (P=.08) than low expressers (↓ miR-155). ↑ miR-155 had lower CR rates (P<.001), shorter DFS (P=.001) and OS (P<.001), than ↓ miR-155. In multivariable analyses (MVA; Table), ↑ miR-155 was associated with lower CR rates (P=.007) and shorter OS (P<.001). Among younger pts, ↑ miR-155 had lower CR rates (P=.03) and shorter DFS (P<.001) and OS (P<.001) than ↓ miR-155. In MVA (Table), ↑ miR-155 status remained associated with worse CR rate (P=.06), shorter DFS (P=.003) and OS (P=.01). Among older pts, ↑ miR-155 had lower CR rates (P=.008) and shorter OS (P<.001); in MVA (Table), ↑ miR-155 remained associated with worse CR (P=.03) and shorter OS (P=.05). In the European LeukemiaNet classification, younger ↑ miR-155 in the Favorable (Fav) Genetic Group (GG; CEBPA-mut and/or NPM1-mut without FLT3-ITD) had lower CR rates (P=.03) and shorter DFS (P=.04) and OS (P=.02) than ↓ miR-155. In the younger Intermediate-I (Int-I) GG pts (with wild-type CEBPA, NPM1-mut with FLT3-ITD, or wild-type NPM1), miR-155 expression did not impact independently on outcome. In older pts, ↑ miR-155 had a shorter OS both in the Fav (P=.06) and Int-I GGs (P=.05) than ↓ miR-155. To gain biologic insights, we derived an Affymetrix gene-expression signature that comprised 196 mRNAs significantly correlated with miR-155 expression. Consistent with previous mechanistic studies, Gene Ontology analysis revealed that the ↑ miR-155-associated signature was enriched for genes involved in anti-apoptotic, proliferative and inflammatory activities (FDR<0.05). ↑ miR-155 was not significantly correlated with that of any other microRNAs (miRs) thereby supporting the unique role of miR-155 among the miRs in AML. In summary, miR-155 expression is independently associated with clinical outcome in CN-AML and may allow for better evaluation of molecular risk, especially in pts lacking FLT3-ITD, like those in the ELN Fav GG. Moreover, given its role in deregulation of fundamental mechanisms of cell homeostasis and the emergence of miR inhibitors, miR-155 may become a novel therapeutic target.TableMVA in pts with primary CN-AMLGroupCRDFSOSORPHRPHRPAll ptsmiR-155 expression not significantly associated with DFSamiR-155, ↑ v ↓0.46.0071.62<.001NPM1, mut v wt2.42.005BAALC, ↑ v ↓0.37.0022.16<.001WBC, each 50 units0.65<.001Age group, older v younger0.43.0032.38<.001FLT3-ITD, pos v neg1.78<.001Race, white v nonwhite1.62.03Pts age < 60 ymiR-155, ↑ v ↓0.39.062.13.0031.84.01RUNX1, mut v wt0.21.01Age, each 10 y increase0.45.004WBC, each 50 units1.49<.001FLT3-ITD, pos v neg2.82<.0011.82.01FLT3-TKD, pos v neg3.27<.001BAALC, ↑ v ↓2.66<.0012.33<.001Race, white v nonwhite2.81.02CEBPA, mut v wt0.47.02WT1, mut v wt2.25.005Pts age ≥ 60 ymiR-155 expression not significantly associated with DFSmiR-155, ↑ v ↓0.46.031.36.05NPM1, mut v wt2.45.03BAALC, ↑ v ↓0.32.0042.18<.001WBC, each 50 units0.65.005Age, each 10 y increase0.48.02FLT3-ITD, pos v neg1.56.006↑, high expression; ↓, low expression; CR, complete remission; DFS, disease-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; mut, mutated; neg, negative; OR, odds ratio; OS, overall survival; pos, positive; WBC, white blood count; wt, wild-type.Odds ratios > (<) 1.0 mean higher (lower) CR rate and HRs > (<) 1.0 mean higher (lower) risk of relapse or death (DFS) or death (OS) for the higher values of continuous variables and the 1st category listed for categorical variables. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.