Abstract

Objective: to refine the pattern of clinical manifestations of epileptic autonomic auras (EAA) and to reveal clinical, electroencephalographic, and neuroimaging ratios. Patients and methods. Eighteen patients (8, 41% men and 10, 59% women) aged 9 to 27years (mean 18±5years) were examined. The examination encompassed analysis of history data, clinical and neurological studies, long-term video-assisted electroencephalographic monitoring, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Results. In most patients (n = 12, 67%), the symptoms of EAA corresponded to the criteria for abdominal one. In the other patients, the clinical manifestations resembled autonomic paroxysms as attacks of panic. Interictal pathological changes on an electroencephalogram (EEG) were present in the frontal, temporal, and frontotemporal regions in 4 (22%), 6 (33%), and 7 (39%) patients, respectively, as well as in both the left and right hemispheres without significant differences. Pathological EEG changes were not found in one case. MRI detected that 13 (72%) patients had structural changes that were potentially eliptogenic. Conclusion. The clinical symptoms of EAA give information on the site of a primary pathological focus. It is necessary to differentiate EAA from non-epileptic paroxysmal states. The autonomic phenomena of epileptic genesis help study the functional organizations of the autonomic nervous system.

Highlights

  • In most patients (n = 12, 67%), the symptoms of epileptic autonomic auras (EAA) corresponded to the criteria for abdominal one

  • Interictal pathological changes on an electroencephalogram (EEG) were present in the frontal, temporal, and frontotemporal regions in 4 (22%), 6 (33%), and 7 (39%) patients, respectively, as well as in both the left and right hemispheres without significant differences

  • Pathological EEG changes were not found in one case

Read more

Summary

Клиника и диагностика вегетативных эпилептических аур

Цель исследования: уточнение характера клинических проявлений вегетативных эпилептических аур (ВА), выявление клиникоэлектроэнцефалографических и нейровизуализационных соотношений. У большинства больных (12 пациентов, 67%) симптомы ВА соответствовали критериям абдоминальной. У остальных пациентов клинические проявления ауры напоминали вегетативные пароксизмы по типу панических атак. Интериктальные патологические изменения электроэнцефалограммы (ЭЭГ) были представлены в лобных отделах у 4 (22%) больных, в височных – у 6 (33%), в лобно-височных – у 7 (39%), как в левом, так и в правом полушарии без достоверных различий. При МРТ у 13 (72%) пациентов определялись структурные изменения, в большинстве случаев имеющие потенциально эпилептогенный характер. The clinical presentation and diagnosis of epileptic autonomic auras M.R. Kremenchugskaya, E.I. Barletova, K.Yu. Mukhin, L.Yu. Glukhova1 1Saint Luke Institute of Pediatric Neurology and Epilepsy, 2Department of Psychoneurology and Psychosomatic Pathology, Research Center for Children’s Health, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow. Objective: to refine the pattern of clinical manifestations of epileptic autonomic auras (EAA) and to reveal clinical, electroencephalographic, and neuroimaging ratios

Patients and methods
Findings
Сообщает о загрудинной боли
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.