Abstract
. Dretzke J., Davenport C., Frew E., Barlow J., Stewart‐Brown S., Bayliss S., Taylor R. S., Sandercock J. & Hyde C. ( 2009 ) , 3 , 7 . DOI: 10.1186/1753‐2000‐3‐7 . Background Conduct problems are common, disabling and costly. The prognosis for children with conduct problems is poor, with outcomes in adulthood including criminal behaviour, alcoholism, drug abuse, domestic violence, child abuse and a range of psychiatric disorders. There has been a rapid expansion of group‐based parent‐training programmes for the treatment of children with conduct problems in a number of countries over the past 10 years. Existing reviews of parent training have methodological limitations such as inclusion of non‐randomized studies, the absence of investigation for heterogeneity prior to meta‐analysis or failure to report confidence intervals. The objective of the current study was to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of parenting programmes for the treatment of children with conduct problems. Methods Standard systematic review methods were followed including duplicate inclusion decisions, data extraction and quality assessment. Twenty electronic databases from the fields of medicine, psychology, social science and education were comprehensively searched for RCTs and systematic reviews to February 2006. Inclusion criteria were: RCT; of structured, repeatable parenting programmes; for parents/carers of children up to the age of 18 with a conduct problem; and at least one measure of child behaviour. Meta‐analysis and qualitative synthesis were used to summarize included studies. Results A total of 57 RCTs were included. Studies were small with an average group size of 21. Metaanalyses using both parent (SMD1−0.67; 95% CI: −0.91, −0.42) and independent (SMD −0.44; 95% CI: −0.66, −0.23) reports of outcome showed significant differences favouring the intervention group. There was insufficient evidence to determine the relative effectiveness of different approaches to delivering parenting programmes. Conclusion Parenting programmes are an effective treatment for children with conduct problems. The relative effectiveness of different parenting programmes requires further research.
Highlights
There was insufficient evidence to determine the relative effectiveness of different approaches to delivering parenting programmes
Parenting programmes are an effective treatment for children with conduct problems
Dyadic Parent Interactive Child Scale (DPICS) scores were combined using a random effects model and the combined data show a significant standardised mean difference favouring the intervention group of SMD -0.44
Summary
Based on a survey by the Office of National Statistics (UK) from 1999[1], 5.3% of all children and adolescents between the ages of 5–15 had clinically significant conduct problems, the commonest reason for referral for psychological and psychiatric treatment in childhood [2]. Conduct problems are common, disabling and costly. The prognosis for children with conduct problems is poor, with outcomes in adulthood including criminal behaviour, alcoholism, drug abuse, domestic violence, child abuse and a range of psychiatric disorders. There has been a rapid expansion of group based parent-training programmes for the treatment of children with conduct problems in a number of countries over the past 10 years. The objective of the current study was to systematically review randomised controlled trials of parenting programmes for the treatment of children with conduct problems Existing reviews of parent training have methodological limitations such as inclusion of non-randomised studies, the absence of investigation for heterogeneity prior to meta-analysis or failure to report confidence intervals.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
