Abstract

The network of residential areas in the region of Gjirokastra has changed depending of a complex factors. This has affected to the utilization rate of the region's rural territories. Considering the economic orientation of rural settlements by relief factor, we look that in settlements that lie in the landscape field, dominates this main branch of the economy: agriculture, livestock, processing of agricultural and livestock products and trade. In settlements that lie in low relief and high montane prevail livestock and orchards, while in the mountainous terrain of petty farming prevails (in villages of municipalities Picar, Cepo, Pogon and Frasher). To achieve this classification serves the real estate registry, which contains books of plots, with surfaces by categories (arable land, orchard, vineyards, forests, pastures, unproductive land). Until 1990, social-economic factor determining in order to limit the application of the regulatory policies of rural settlements. The old system aimed the limiting of the occupation of agricultural land and increasing population density in the rural area. After 1990 have not been implemented proper policies for the development of rural areas. Gjirokastra region rural areas have outstanding value to the organization as space and landscape, as well as the architecture and internal organization of housing and other buildings, infrastructure etc. Cohabitation over the Albanian population and Greek, especially in the rural area, there are approximate customs and traditions, communication and behavior, building style furnishing of flats, etc., creating an original model of the rural community, which can serve as gjeohapesire nucleus of a regional cross-border dimensions, where citizens of both countries (Albania and Greece) working for sustainable rural development. DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p24

Highlights

  • Agricultural functionInterest to deal with this issue is indicative of the dominance of the agricultural area on the surface of each village

  • The network of residential areas in the region of Gjirokastra has changed depending of a complex factors

  • In Gjirokastra District, agricultural function is dominant in the villages of Upper Dropull Commune, Lunxhëri (Valare, Nokovë Erind and Gjatë), Odrie (Hundëkuq and Labovë the Great), Lower Dropull (Bularat, Vodhine, Likomil, Bodrishtë, Zervat, Jergucat, Kakavie and Dritë, Libohovë Center (Bulo, Upper Labovë and Nepravishtë) Cepo (Çepunë, Palokastër, Mashkullorë and Kodër), Antigone (Arshi Lengo), where agricultural area occupies more than 40% of the total

Read more

Summary

Agricultural function

Interest to deal with this issue is indicative of the dominance of the agricultural area on the surface of each village Related to this indicator are remarkable Gjirokastra District, Communes (Lower Dropull: 70.5%, Lunxhëri: 44.2% and Upper Dropull: 42.4%) and Buz Commune of Tepelena District, where agricultural land consist in 47.3% of the total. In Gjirokastra District, agricultural function is dominant in the villages of Upper Dropull Commune, Lunxhëri (Valare, Nokovë Erind and Gjatë), Odrie (Hundëkuq and Labovë the Great), Lower Dropull (Bularat, Vodhine, Likomil, Bodrishtë, Zervat, Jergucat, Kakavie and Dritë, Libohovë Center (Bulo, Upper Labovë and Nepravishtë) Cepo (Çepunë, Palokastër, Mashkullorë and Kodër), Antigone (Arshi Lengo), where agricultural area occupies more than 40% of the total. In Tepelenë District, agricultural function is dominant in the villages of the Commune Buz (Selckë, Glava, Golemaj and Shale), Qesarat (Anë Vjosë and Qesarat) Luftinjë (Tosk Martalloz, Ballaj and Upper Luftinjë), Krahës (Krahës, Zhulaj, Përparim and Lulëzim), Memaliaj Village (Cërrilë, Memaliaj Village and Mirina), Lopës (Sinanaj) and Center (Dragot), where agricultural area occupies more than 41% of the total

Livestock function
Agro-Tourism function
Agro-industrial function
Period 1945-1989
Spatial Organization in Function of the Dominant Activities
Organization and Architecture of Rural Settlements
Agricultural Cities and their Role in Rural Development
The period after 1990
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.