The classification of hiatal shapes and their use as a marker for complexity, operative interventions, and recurrence

Abstract

BackgroundDiaphragmatic reconstruction is a vital, but challenging component of hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery. Results are optimized by minimizing axial tension along the esophagus, assessed with intra-abdominal length, and radial tension across the hiatus, which has not been standardized. We categorized hiatal openings into 4 shapes, as a surrogate for radial tension, to correlate their association with operative interventions and recurrence. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all primary hiatal hernias (≥3 cm) repaired at a single center between 2010 and 2020. Patients with intraoperative hiatal photos with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. The hiatal openings were classified into 4 shapes: slit, inverted teardrop, “D,” and oval, and ordered in this manner of hypothesized increased complexity and tension. ResultsA total of 239 patients were studied, with 113 (47%) having a recurrence. Age (P < .001), proportion of paraesophageal hernias (P < .001), hernia axial length (P < .001), and hiatal width (P < .001) all increased as shape progressed from slit to inverted teardrop to “D” to oval. Mesh (P = .003) and relaxing incisions (P < .001) were more commonly employed in more advanced shapes, “D” and ovals. However, recurrence (P = .88) did not correlate with hiatal shape. ConclusionFour different hiatal shapes are commonly seen during hernia repair. These shapes represent a spectrum of hernia chronicity and complexity necessitating increased use of operative measures but not correlating with recurrence. Despite failing to be a direct marker for recurrence risk, hiatal shape may serve as an intraoperative tool to inform surgeons of the potential need for additional hiatal interventions.