Abstract

The goal of the present paper is to provide a revaluation of the classification of the Bedouin dialects of Northern Arabia and the Southern Levant, based on published or publicly available data and on first-hand data recently collected amongst some Bedouin tribes in Northern Jordan. We suggest extending previous classifications that identify three types of dialects, namely A (ʿnizi), B (šammari), and C (šāwi). Although intermediary or mixed types combining šammari features with šāwi features were already noted, our data suggest that further combinations are possible, either because they had so far been unnoticed or because recent levelling and dialect mixing have blurred the boundaries between some of the varieties.

Highlights

  • The goal of the present paper is to provide a revaluation of the classification of the Bedouin dialects of Northern Arabia and the Southern Levant, based on published or publicly available data and on first-hand data recently collected by the authors amongst some Bedouin tribes in Northern Jordan

  • Cantineau already noted intermediary or mixed types combining šāmmari features with šāwi features, our data suggest that further combinations are possible, either because they have so far not been noticed or because recent levelling and dialect mixing have blurred the boundaries between some of the varieties

  • His classification of the Bedouin dialects includes those of the Negev Bedouins, the dialects of southern

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The dialects of the North Arabian Bedouins (Cantineau’s types A and B). Of the imperfective of qāl would partially solve this problem, which, combined with geography, yields the following classification: Southern ygūlu, Central ygūlu, and Northern ygūlūn. Misāīdwhich dialect ex maria features mari focus features such as such as the passive (yiḏkar passive ‘it(yiḏkar is remembered’). We present thenthe present salient the features salient of features thetodialect, of thefollowed dialect classifications. We present the salient features of the dialect, followed by a small ple takenple from taken thefrom recordings. The deals with the classification the present dialect indialect the last light inpart the of previous light of previous literature.

Cantineau’s Classification
X: In addition addition
Cleveland’s Classification of the Dialects of Transjordan
Palva’s Classification
Younes’ Subgrouping of Ca
Features of the Misā ıd Dialect
Phonology
Thesemultiplied
Dialect
Discussion and Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.