Abstract

This essay explores political relations and practices of claim-making between Indian citizens and the state in the aftermath of the Bhopal gas explosion of 2–3 December 1984. While not discounting the transnational dimensions of environmental problems across the Global South, nor postcolonial fatigue with the nation-state, it argues survivors remain invested in the state for redress and continue to engage with it through forms of claim-making that center on the injured body. It does so by examining the rhetoric of survivor testimony and legal documents about the 1989 settlement, as well as Indra Sinha’s novel Animal’s People (2007). I argue survivor testimonies mobilize bodily pain to both hail and revise promises of government welfare enshrined in legal documents surrounding the Bhopal case, while the novel moves beyond the revision of welfare as a shared category of political legibility. Animal’s People posits that post-disaster terms of political relation arise from the citizenry themselves as they articulate the unruliness of their toxified bodies, specifically characterized as non-human assemblages. This essay argues these accounts reenvision the role of the state in toxic redress and environmental harm, and turn citizen strategies of survival into suggestions for better forms of postcolonial governance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.