Abstract

Conventional genetic theories have failed to explain why cancer (1) is not heritable and thus extremely rare in newborns, (2) is caused by non-mutagenic carcinogens, (3) develops only years to decades after initiation by carcinogens, (4) follows pre-neoplastic aneuploidy, (5) is aneuploid, (6) is chromosomally and phenotypically “unstable”, (7) carries specific aneusomies, (8) generates much more complex phenotypes than conventional mutation such as multidrug resistance, (9) generates nonselective phenotypes such as metastasis (no benefit at native site) and “immortality” (not necessary for tumorigenesis), and (10) does not contain carcinogenic mutations. We propose, instead, that cancer is a chromosomal disease. Accordingly carcinogenesis is initiated by random aneuploidies, which are induced by carcinogens or spontaneously. Since aneuploidy unbalances 1000s of genes, it corrupts teams of proteins that segregate, synthesize and repair chromosomes. Aneuploidy is therefore a steady source of chromosomal variations from which, in classical Darwinian terms, selection encourages the evolution and malignant progression of cancer cells. The rates of specific chromosomal variations can exceed conventional mutations by 4–11 orders of magnitude, depending on the degrees of aneuploidy. Based on their chromosomal constitution cancer cells are new cell “species” with specific aneusomies, but unstable karyotypes. The cancer-specific aneusomies generate complex, malignant phenotypes through the abnormal dosages of 1000s of genes, just as trisomy 21 generates Down syndrome. In sum, cancer is caused by chromosomal disorganization, which increases karyotypic entropy. Thus, cancer is a chromosomal rather than a genetic disease. The chromosomal theory explains (1) non-heritable cancer because aneuploidy is not heritable, (2) non-mutagenic carcinogens as aneuploidogens, (3) long neoplastic latencies by the low probability of evolving new species, (4) nonselective phenotypes via genes hitchhiking with selective chromosomes, and (5) immortality because, through their cellular heterogeneity, cancers survive negative mutations and cytotoxic drugs via resistant subspecies.

Highlights

  • Conventional genetic theories have failed to explain why cancer (1) is not heritable and extremely rare in newborns, (2) is caused by non-mutagenic carcinogens, (3) develops only years to decades after initiation by carcinogens, (4) follows pre-neoplastic aneuploidy, (5) is aneuploid, (6) is chromosomally and phenotypically “unstable”, (7) carries specific aneusomies, (8) generates much more complex phenotypes than conventional mutation such as multidrug resistance, (9) generates nonselective phenotypes such as metastasis and “immortality”, and (10) does not contain carcinogenic mutations

  • These heritable mutations are genetic equivalents of carcinogens, which increase the cancer risk by inducing random aneuploidy at high rates. This view is supported by the presence of systemic aneuploidy in patients prior to carcinogenesis [245], as for example in Mosaic variegated aneuploidy [110,146], Retinoblastoma and other chromosomal eye syndromes [52,135,263], Ataxia Telangiectasia and Fanconi anaemia [206,300], Bloom syndrome [99], Gorlin-syndrome [254], and Xeroderma [53,160,282]

  • We conclude that the new chromosomal cancer theory provides a coherent explanation of carcinogenesis and can resolve all features of carcinogenesis that are paradoxical in terms of the prevailing genetic theories of cancer

Read more

Summary

Cause of cancer still a matter of debate

Despite over 100 years of cancer research the cause of cancer is still a matter of debate between theories postulating either mutation or chromosomal alteration or epigenetic events as causes of cancer [43,69,75,77, 79,85,94,102,107,114,137,169,170,185,189,190,215, 225,234,248,251,257,261,264,265,269,273,286,306]. Tations during the lifetime of a patient [45,108,178, 225,235,286] These theories postulate that, once generated by 4–7 mutations, cancer cells independently progress further within “clonal” cancers to form evermore malignant and heterogeneous cancers via evermore spontaneous mutations – while normal cells of the same patient remain un-mutated [32,33, 46,104,108,154,178,214,280,286,287,288]. These conventional genetic theories cannot explain the following critical properties of carcinogenesis

Cancer is not heritable
Non-mutagenic carcinogens cause cancer
Long neoplastic latencies
Exact correlations between cancer and aneuploidy
Cancer-specific chromosomal alterations
Cancer phenotypes too complex for conventional mutations
Non-selective phenotypes: not helping cancer cells to compete for growth
2.10. No cancer-causing genes in cancer
Proof of principle
Cancer not heritable
High rates of karyotypic–phenotypic variations and “immortality”
Complex phenotypes
Non-selective phenotypes
Is carcinogenesis dependent on mutation?
Mutations of cancer cells as consequences of aneuploidy
Heritable cancer-disposition syndromes also generate cancer via aneuploidy
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call