Abstract

Secondary metabolite biosynthesis genes in fungi are usually physically linked and organized in large gene clusters. The physical linkage of genes involved in the same biosynthetic pathway minimizes the amount of regulatory steps necessary to regulate the biosynthetic machinery and thereby contributes to physiological economization. Regulation by chromatin accessibility is a proficient molecular mechanism to synchronize transcriptional activity of large genomic regions. Chromatin regulation largely depends on DNA and histone modifications and the histone code hypothesis proposes that a certain combination of modifications, such as acetylation, methylation or phosphorylation, is needed to perform a specific task. A number of reports from several laboratories recently demonstrated that fungal secondary metabolite (SM) biosynthesis clusters are controlled by chromatin-based mechanisms and histone acetyltransferases, deacetylases, methyltransferases, and proteins involved in heterochromatin formation were found to be involved. This led to the proposal that establishment of repressive chromatin domains over fungal SM clusters under primary metabolic conditions is a conserved mechanism that prevents SM production during the active growth phase. Consequently, transcriptional activation of SM clusters requires reprogramming of the chromatin landscape and replacement of repressive histone marks by activating marks. This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of chromatin-based SM cluster regulation and highlights some of the open questions that remain to be answered before we can draw a more comprehensive picture.

Highlights

  • Recent editions of natural products databases, such as “Antibase” contain structures and chemical characteristics of almost 39,000 different microbial “secondary metabolites” (SMs) (Laatsch 2011)

  • Despite the enormous number of known metabolites, it is estimated that they represent only a small fraction of SMs fungi are able to produce in their natural habitats. These conclusions are drawn from genome sequencing projects which revealed a much higher number of potential secondary metabolite genes compared to the known metabolites in each sequenced species (Chiang et al 2011; Cuomo et al 2007; Galagan et al 2005). It is still unclear why most of the genes coding for polyketide synthases (PKSs) or nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are not expressed under the conditions in which we study them

  • We previously summarized the factors so far identified to play a role in heterochromatin formation and SM gene silencing in A. nidulans (Strauss and ReyesDominguez 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent editions of natural products databases, such as “Antibase” contain structures and chemical characteristics of almost 39,000 different microbial “secondary metabolites” (SMs) (Laatsch 2011) Such impressive variety of small organic molecules is produced by fungi and bacteria usually only under special growth conditions termed “secondary metabolism”. Co-production of dark-induced sexual fruiting bodies with secondary metabolites, on the other hand, could have evolved because it ensured survival of the organism under competitive conditions where growth inside a substrate (dark and low oxygen concentration) would prevent aerosol dispersal of conidiospores (David Canovas, personal communication) It is not yet well established whether other fungi link SM production with the darkness induced sexual cycle and the ecological significance of this regulatory mechanism remains to be verified. We update the picture of chromatin-based fungal SM cluster regulation and highlight similarities and differences between individual clusters within the same organism and between species

Regulation of gene activity by chromatin structure and histone modifications
Histone modifications and the chromatin landscape in SM gene clusters
SM cluster regulation by facultative heterochromatin
The chromatin code is different for different SM clusters
LaeA and the crosstalk to histone methylation
Does heterochromatin also regulate SM in other fungi?
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call