The CHOIR study: acute hemodynamic effects of different pacing strategies in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Abstract

Abstract Background The majority of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy present with dynamic left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), referred to as hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Symptomatic treatment aims at reducing LVOTO with either medical therapy, invasive septal reducing therapies, or pacemaker therapy. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of pacemaker therapy. The effect of pacing strategies at physical exertion has not been investigated in HOCM. Purpose To identify the optimal pacing strategy for reducing LVOTO without compromising cardiac output at rest and exercise in HOCM. Methods In this ongoing project, we have so far included eight patients with symptomatic HOCM referred to our hospital for alcohol septal ablation (ASA). The day before ASA, we placed temporary pacing leads in the right atrium, the right ventricular (RV) apex and on the LV lateral wall. We also inserted a pulmonary artery catheter and performed per operative echocardiography. All patients had sinus rhythm. Intrinsic rhythm served as baseline and was followed by atrial sensed RV pacing, LV pacing and biventricular (BiV) pacing at rest and during supine cycling. We assessed LVOTO by echocardiography, and cardiac output by the thermodilution method under intrinsic rhythm and all pacing modalities. Results The mean age was 52±15 years, and two of eight patients were female. The mean maximal LV wall thickness was 16±1 mm. The resting LVOTO was 50±23 mmHg. Due to difficulties in placing the LV lead within a reasonable time frame, complete study protocol was not performed in all patients. All eight patients performed RV pace at rest, but only five patients (63 %) were LV and BiV paced at rest. Five patients performed supine cycling but only four patients completed with RV and BiV pacing. The graphs display LVOTO and CO in sinus rhythm and the different pacing maneuvers at rest and during supine cycling. At rest, 6 out of 8 patients (75%) had LVOTO reduction during RV pace, and CO was unchanged. Four of five patients (80%) had LVOTO reduction during BiV and LV pace compared to sinus rhythm, also with unchanged CO. During supine cycling four of five patients (80%) had a reduction of the LVOTO gradient during RV and BiV pacing, without significant CO change. No complications occurred during the interventions. Conclusion In this ongoing study on cardiac pacing in HOCM, RV, LV, and BiV pacing reduced LVOTO while CO remained unchanged at rest and during exercise.