Abstract
We examine the factors that influence family firms that are no longer run by the founder, to appoint a chief executive officer from the family rather than from outside the family. Based on agency and signaling theories, we hypothesize that the concentration of family ownership and the presence of the founder increase the likelihood of appointing a family CEO, whereas the gap between voting rights and cash-flow rights (excess voting rights) decreases it. Our regression analyses of Canadian S&P/TSX family firms over the 2002–2008 period confirm our theory that contextual governance factors are good predictors of the type of CEO chosen in family firms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
