Abstract
The bulk of academic studies characterize the contemporary U.S. – China relations as asymmetrical ones, in which the relations' agenda − a course towards finding areas of cooperation or emphasizing contradictions/rivalry − was set by Washington's policy towards China, with the latter being more of a reacting party. In this paper, I argue that one needs a further and deeper reflection on the current confrontation between the U.S. and China, in particular the reasons and circumstances of how and why the “Chinese dream” of a remarkable renaissance of the Chinese nation became an American nightmare, forcing Washington to opt for a containment policy against China. In this regard, I show the importance of tracing the dynamics of the post-Cold War development of the U.S. – China relations to comprehend the patterns and logic of the shaping of American policy towards China. The article also explains the evolution of U.S. – China relations in the post-Cold War period as determined by the presence or absence of a strategic basis in the U.S. – China relations, which implies cooperation between the two countries in stopping the external existential threat to the U.S. So, I conclude that the uniqueness of the current stage lies in the fact that, because of China's emergence as a strong global power and Washington's disillusions about China, China itself is beginning to be perceived by Washington as an existential threat, to stop which the containment policy should be applied.
Highlights
The bulk of academic studies characterize the contemporary U.S – China relations as asymmetrical ones, in which the relations' agenda − a course towards finding areas of cooperation or emphasizing contradictions/rivalry − was set by Washington's policy towards China, with the latter being more of a reacting party
I argue that one needs a further and deeper reflection on the current confrontation between the U.S and China, in particular the reasons and circumstances of how and why the “Chinese dream” of a remarkable renaissance of the Chinese nation became an American nightmare, forcing Washington to opt for a containment policy against China
The article explains the evolution of U.S – China relations in the post-Cold War period as determined by the presence or absence of a strategic basis in the U.S – China relations, which implies cooperation between the two countries in stopping the external existential threat to the U.S So, I conclude that the uniqueness of the current stage lies in the fact that, because of China's emergence as a strong global power and Washington's disillusions about China, China itself is beginning to be perceived by Washington as an existential threat, to stop which the containment policy should be applied
Summary
«Китайская мечта» или «американский кошмар»: к чему пришли американокитайские отношения за три десятилетия. Для американо-китайских отношений всегда была характерна асимметрия, при которой вектор их развития – курс на поиск сфер сотрудничества или акцентирование противоречий / соперничества – задавался проводимой Вашингтоном политикой в отношении Китая, а последний выступал реагирующей стороной. Наблюдаемое ныне усиление конфронтации между США и Китаем обуславливает необходимость осмысления того, как и почему «китайская мечта» о великом возрождении нации стала «американским кошмаром», заставив Вашингтон сделать выбор в пользу политики «сдерживания» Китая. И напротив, в условиях отсутствия такой угрозы отношения были нестабильными, происходило обострение противоречий и соперничества. Уникальность современного этапа состоит в том, что ввиду становления Китая в качестве глобальной державы и неоправдавшихся ожиданий Вашингтона в отношении Пекина уже сам Китай начинает восприниматься Вашингтоном в качестве экзистенциальной угрозы
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.