Abstract
The paper draws on Paul Miller's framework (technical, semantic, political/human, intercommunity, legal and international interoperability) to examine CHIN as an organization that strives toward interoperability as part of its core mandate. Based on the CHIN experience, it is argued that any attempt to advance the concept of interoperability must include consensus and compatibility, aggregation, integration and interface‐ability as concepts.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
