Abstract
Using angle resolved UV photoelectron spectroscopy, coupled with the continuum of polarized light available with synchrotron radiation, we make an interpretation of the photoelectron spectrum of CO adsorbed on Cu(100). We point out that the bonding of CO on Cu as observed by photoemission is considerably different from the bonding of CO on Ni. These differences do not seem to be caused by bonding orientation differences, however, as the CO molecular axis is found to be very close to the surface normal, as was the case for CO on Ni(100). No evidence is found for a second phase of CO on Cu(100).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
