THE CHEMICAL REGULATION OF THE DORMANCY PHASES OF BUD DEVELOPMENT

Abstract

literature pertaining to the development and regulation of dormancy in the buds of woody species is reviewed and interpreted as follows. Morphological observations, the effects of environmental factors, and other evidence support the concept that bud dormancy involves a cycle of 3 separate phases of development. Beginning at the developmental pattern of spring, the 3 phases are: (1) dormancy development leading to the dormant state; (2) release from dormancy leading to the non‐dormant state; and (3) the initiation of spring burst leading again to spring development. The regulation of dormancy is, therefore, discussed in terms of the regulation of development of the apex within each phase and the regulation of transitions between phases. The principal existing theory of dormancy regulation implies that dormancy consists, in total, of merely the inhibition of spring development, and that regulation involves first the accumulation of an inhibitor then its disappearance. The conceptual basis of this inhibitor theory is argued to be inadequate as is the experimental evidence for the existence of a specific inhibitor and for a correlation between its concentration and dormancy induction or release. There is little direct evidence on the mechanism of the regulation of bud development within any developmental phase. Circumstantial evidence suggests the developmental patterns arise from chemical patterns resulting from the interactions of classes of growth regulator such as auxin, kinin, and gibberellin. Some evidence exists concerning the regulation of the transitions between the phases of dormancy. A substance has recently been detected which may be a hormone regulating the initiation of dormancy development. The production of this substance may be photoperiodically determined. A role for gibberellins in the regulation of dormancy release has been postulated.