Abstract

Abstract. In this study, the cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning flash/stroke density was derived from the lightning location finder (LLF) data recorded between 2007 and 2011. The vulnerability of land surfaces was then assessed from the classification of the study areas into buildings, outdoor areas under the building canopy and open-field areas, which makes it convenient to deduce the location factor and confirm the protective capability. Subsequently, the potential number of dangerous lightning events at a location could be estimated from the product of the CG stroke density and the location's vulnerability. Although the human beings and all their material properties are identically exposed to lightning, the lightning casualty risk and property loss risk was assessed respectively due to their vulnerability discrepancy. Our analysis of the CG flash density in Beijing revealed that the valley of JuMaHe to the southwest, the ChangPing–ShunYi zone downwind of the Beijing metropolis, and the mountainous PingGu–MiYun zone near the coast are the most active lightning areas, with densities greater than 1.5 flashes km−2 year−1. Moreover, the mountainous northeastern, northern, and northwestern rural areas are relatively more vulnerable to lightning because the high-elevation terrain attracts lightning and there is little protection. In contrast, lightning incidents by induced lightning are most likely to occur in densely populated urban areas, and the property damage caused by lightning here is more extensive than that in suburban and rural areas. However, casualty incidents caused by direct lightning strokes seldom occur in urban areas. On the other hand, the simulation based on the lightning risk assessment model (LRAM) demonstrates that the casualty risk is higher in rural areas, whereas the property loss risk is higher in urban areas, and this conclusion is also supported by the historical casualty and damage reports.

Highlights

  • Lightning severely threatens the safety of human beings and their property (Elsom, 1993, 2001; Holle et al, 1996, 2005; Curran et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2011) and has been recognized as one of the most dangerous natural disasters by the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) (Ma et al, 2008)

  • The lightning risk assessment model (LRAM) is designed to perform on a geographical information systems (GIS) grid composed of 182 × 181 cells (Fig. 2), ranging from 115.3672 to 117.5213◦ E and from 39.4207 to 41.0714◦ N, which covers the entire area of Beijing

  • 7 Conclusion The CG flash/stroke density derived from lightning location finder (LLF) data rationally reflects the regional lightning activity around Beijing, and three relatively high CG flash density zones have been identified, all in rural areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lightning severely threatens the safety of human beings and their property (Elsom, 1993, 2001; Holle et al, 1996, 2005; Curran et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2011) and has been recognized as one of the most dangerous natural disasters by the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) (Ma et al, 2008). The population and its properties are recognized as the components of exposure to lightning, as the lightning risk is considerably influenced by the distribution of population density (Holle et al, 2005; Wisdom, 2009; Zhang et al, 2011). Vulnerability is another crucial factor in lightning risk (Ashley and Gilson, 2009). The simulation demonstrates the hypothesis of the lightning risk recognition in urban and rural areas in which the lightning casualty risk is higher in rural areas, whereas the property loss risk is higher in urban areas (Holle et al, 1996, 2005; Curran et al, 2000; Elsom, 1993, 2001; Wisdom, 2009)

The lightning location finder data
The lightning casualties and damages reports
The basic risk assessment formula
The method of calculating ANDLE
The collection area of a building to lightning
Location factor of building
Protective capability of building
Casualty probability
Internal systems failure probability
Quantification of a building protective capability
Estimating the ANDLE of the outdoor area under a building canopy
Estimating the ANDLE of an open-field area not under a building canopy
Implementation of the lightning risk assessment model
Lightning casualty risk
Lightning-related property loss risk
Risk simulation and analysis
Vulnerability
Average annual number of dangerous lightning events
The lightning casualty risk
Property loss risk
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call