The Characteristics of HER2 Low-Expressing Breast Cancer: a China Single-Center Real-World Data Analysis

BackgroundThere is an increasing interest in HER2-low breast cancer with promising data from clinical trials using novel anti-HER2 antibody–drug conjugates. We explored the differences in clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-IHC 0 breast cancer.MethodsUsing nationwide data from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry between 2006 and 2011, 30,491 patients with stages I to III breast cancer were included in the analysis: 9,506 (31.2%) in the HER2-low group and 20,985 (68.8%) in the HER2-IHC 0 group. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression survival analysis were used to compare breast cancer-specific survival between the two groups.ResultsHER2-low breast cancer was more frequent in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer than in those with triple-negative breast cancer. In patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, HER2-low breast cancer was associated with fewer T4 tumors, higher histological grade, and a negative lymphatic invasion. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer, HER2-low breast cancer was associated with a high lymph node ratio and positive lymphatic invasion. HER2-low breast cancer was significantly associated with a lower Ki-67 labeling index. No significant difference was observed in overall survival between the two groups. HER2-low breast cancer showed significantly better breast cancer-specific survival than HER2-IHC 0 breast cancer, regardless of the hormone receptor status. In multivariate analysis, the impact of low HER2 expression on breast cancer-specific survival was significant only in triple-negative breast cancer (HRs, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49–0.93; P = 0.019).ConclusionsThese findings suggest that the biology and clinical impact of low HER2 expression can differ according to the hormone receptor status and support the need for further investigation on the understanding of the biology of HER2-low breast cancer.

Real-World Data on Pathological Response and Survival Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Low Breast Cancer Patients

BMI is an independent prognostic factor for late outcome in patients diagnosed with early breast cancer: A landmark survival analysis

The efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has been previously established. However, significant adverse events related to endocrine therapy cannot be ignored. T1 breast cancer is expected to have a good prognosis. Therefore, adjuvant endocrine therapy for T1a breast cancer patients is controversial. Thus, in this study, we examined the effect of endocrine therapy on the prognosis of T1N0 hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients in each tumor size group, and re-considered the application of endocrine therapy. We retrospectively obtained clinical and pathological data from medical records of 7635 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer at Aichi Cancer Hospital between January 2000 and December 2017. The primary end point of our analysis was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end points were distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). The log-rank test, cumulative survival generated curves with Kaplan-Meier methods and the hazard ratio (HR) calculated with a Cox regression model were used to assess the effects of endocrine therapy on prognosis. The 5-year DFS was worse in the non-endocrine therapy (non-ET) group (78%) than the endocrine therapy (ET) group (95%) in the T1c population (p < 0.001, HR 0.25). However, there was no statistically significant difference in DFS between the ET and the non-ET groups in T1a (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.9314, HR 0.94) and T1b (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.1481HR 0.53) breast cancer. The OS, DDFS, and BCSS of the patients also showed that endocrine therapy was associated with improvement of the prognosis in the T1c group, but not in the T1a and T1b groups. Adjuvant endocrine therapy may be essential for T1c breast cancer patients. In contrast, this therapy should be discussed for T1a and T1b luminal breast cancer patients under some circumstances, such as suffering from adverse events.

ObjectiveThis study aims to analyze whether there are any differences in clinicopathological features and prognosis between HER2 ultra-low, HER2-null, and HER2-low expression in Chinese breast cancer (BC) patients.MethodsThe clinicopathological data of 1363 HER2-negative BC patients were retrospectively collected (from January 2018 to December 2019). HER2 status was further classified into HER2-null, HER2 ultra-low, and HER2-low. HER2-null expression is defined as infiltrating cancer cells completely free of staining. HER2 ultra-low expression is defined as ≤10% of infiltrating cancer cells showing incomplete and faint/weak membrane staining. HER2-low expression is defined as HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization (ISH) assay.ResultsOf 1363 patients, there were 86 (6.3%) HER2-null patients, 395 (29.0%) HER2 ultra-low patients, and 882 (64.7%) HER2-low patients. HER2 ultra-low patients were different from HER2-low patients in terms of N stage, hormone receptor (HR) status, Ki-67 expression, and type of surgery. There were also significant differences in histologic type and postoperative endocrine therapy between HER2 ultra-low and HER2-null patients. HR+ (81.0%) tumors was more common than HR− (19.0%) in HER2 ultra-low patients. In addition, there was a significant difference in HR status between HER2 ultra-low and HER2-low patients (P = 0.001). The survival analysis showed that HER2 status had no effect on disease-free survival (DFS) in HER2-negative patients (all P > 0.05). However, regardless of HER2 status, HR+ patients had better DFS than HR− patients (P = 0.003). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that age (HR [95% CI] = 0.950 [0.928, 0.972], P < 0.001), HR status (HR [95% CI] = 3.342 [1.658, 6.736], P = 0.001), and postoperative endocrine therapy (HR [95% CI] = 0.048 [0.048, 0.023], P < 0.001) were important influencing factors of DFS in HER2-negative BC patients.ConclusionHER2 ultra-low BC patients demonstrated distinct clinicopathological features from HER2-null and HER2-low tumors; while, HER2 status (null, ultra-low, or low) had no prognostic value in these HER2-negative BC population. Consistent with the published literature, HR status was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in HER2-negative BC patients.

Corrections: 2009 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Abstracts

Clinicopathological features and prognoses of very young patients (≤35 years) with breast cancer: a retrospective population-based study in China.

Prognostic Significance of Stromal Platelet-Derived Growth Factor β-Receptor Expression in Human Breast Cancer

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) has renewed interests of researchers worldwide. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with HER2-low, HER2-0 and HER2 ultra-low BC and make conclusion. We collected cases of patients who were diagnosed as BC at Jingling General hospital. Immunohistochemistry was used to redefine HER2 scores. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare survival. We found that HER2-low BC was more frequent in hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC patients and was associated with fewer T3-T4, lower breast conserving surgery rate and higher adjuvant chemotherapy rate. HER2-low BC patients had better overall survival (OS) compared to HER2-0 BC in premenopausal and stage II BC. Furthermore, HER2-0 BC patients had lower Ki-67 expression levels compared to HER2-ultra low and HER2-low BC in HR-negative BC. HER2-0 BC patients also had worse OS rate compared to those with HER2-ultra low BC in HR-positive BC. Finally, HER2-0 BC patients showed a higher pathological response rate compared to those with HER2-low BC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings suggest that HER2-low BC has distinct biology and clinical features compared to HER2-0 BC, and more investigation is needed to understand the biology of HER2-ultra low BC.

BackgroundLow human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is an emerging concept in breast cancer that is defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or IHC 2 + and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) but has been poorly investigated. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of low HER2 expression among HER2-negative breast cancers and compare the clinicopathological features and prognosis of HER2-low patients with those of HER2-zero patients.MethodsWe collected the data of 684 patients with primary HER2-negative breast cancer who underwent surgery between January 2012 and September 2021 from our self-built database. Clinicopathological features, recurrence-free interval (RFI) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared between HER2-low and HER2-zero (IHC 0) patients.ResultsAmong the 684 patients, 512 (74.9%) patients had low HER2 expression, and 172 (25.1%) patients had zero HER2 expression. The average age was 57.7 ± 12.6 years, 472 (69.0%) patients were aged < 65 years, and 212 (31.0%) patients were aged ≥ 65 years. Compared to HER2-zero tumors, HER2-low tumors had a higher proportion of hormone receptor (HR)-positive cases (89.6% vs. 75.6%, P < 0.001) and a lower rate of histological grade III cases (29.4% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that low HER2 expression was associated with prolonged RFI in breast cancer patients, especially in HR + breast cancer patients (P = 0.028) and < 65-year-old breast cancer patients (P = 0.000). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that low HER2 expression was a low-risk factor for RFI (HR: 0.531, 95% CI: 0.292–0.967, P = 0.038) but had no influence on BCSS (P = 0.272).ConclusionsHER2-low tumors had a higher proportion of HR positivity and a lower rate of histological grade III than HER2-zero tumors. Low HER2 expression seemed to be a protective factor for RFI, especially in patients with HR + and those younger than 65 years.

Breast cancer, menopause, and long-term survivorship: critical issues for the 21st century

Background: Breast cancer in younger women has been characterized as a more aggressive disease with relatively poor outcomes compared to breast cancer in older women. This pattern has been attributed to a variety of clinicopathologic characteristics including the enrichment of aggressive HER2+ and TNBC subtypes in younger patients. However, similar to older breast cancer patients, the majority of young breast cancer patients are HR+/HER2-. Here we have evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics and genomic profiles of real-world HR+/HER2- MBC patients to examine the determinants of outcome for younger vs. older patients in this subtype. Patients and Methods: This study included 65 Chinese patients presenting with HR+/HER2- MBC at the Peking University Cancer Hospital. Blood samples were collected upon metastatic disease diagnosis before treatment and profiled with the targeted 152-gene PredicineCARETM sequencing panel. Fourteen patients were &amp;lt; 40 years, 19 were 40-50 years, and 32 were &amp;gt; 50 years at the time of primary cancer diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to analyze outcomes including overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and progression free survival (PFS) in association with clinicopathologic and genomic variables. OS was also evaluated in association with age in separate multivariate models using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Significant variation across age groups was observed for several clinicopathological features, including molecular subtype classification (p = 0.045), de novo Stage IV disease (p = 0.011), type of adjuvant endocrine therapy (p = 5.56E-06), resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapy (p = 0.015) and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.042). Luminal B status was most frequent in patients &amp;lt; 40 years (92.31%), whereas de novo Stage IV disease was more prevalent in patients &amp;gt; 50 years (37.5%). Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were administered as adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) to 73.68% of women &amp;gt; 50 years vs. 16.67% and 0% of women aged 40-50 years and &amp;lt; 40 years, respectively. Resistance to adjuvant ET was observed in 23.08% of patients &amp;lt; 40 years but was not observed in the other age groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by a higher proportion of patients in the 40-50 year age group (94.44%) compared to patients &amp;lt; 40 years (69.23%) and patients &amp;gt; 50 years (60%). No differences in somatic gene alteration frequencies were observed across age groups, menopausal status, germline mutation status or tumor grade. However, a higher frequency of FGFR1 alterations was observed in patients classified as Luminal B vs. A (p = 0.048). Comparison of profiles across women who received adjuvant ET revealed a higher prevalence of FGFR1 (p = 0.012), ATM (p = 0.047) and CCND2 (p = 0.04) alterations in patients treated with AIs vs. SERMS. In addition, a higher frequency of APC alterations was observed in patients with high (≥ 20%) vs. low (&amp;lt; 20%) Ki67 index (p = 0.035). At the univariate level OS was significantly associated with age (p = 0.039). OS was shortest in patients &amp;gt; 50 years, intermediate in patients &amp;lt; 40 years, and longest in patients 40-50 years. Across all patients, shorter OS was also associated with de novo Stage IV disease (p = 0.0001), Luminal B subtype (p = 0.008), adjuvant ET with AIs vs SERMS (p = 0.028) and the presence of an FGFR1 (p = 0.028) or CCND2 (p = 0.033) alteration. In multivariate analyses, OS remained significantly longer for patients aged 40-50 years after adjustment for de novo Stage IV disease, Luminal B subtype and FGFR1 status (all p &amp;lt; 0.05). Conclusions: In this group of real-world HR+/HER2- MBC breast cancer patients, younger age was not associated with worse outcomes. While current guidelines recommend treatment decisions based on tumor biology rather than age, young HR+ breast cancer patients are more likely to receive chemotherapy. Our findings support the development of biomarker-driven treatment strategies for these patients. Citation Format: Jinhao Wang, Yaxin Liu, Bin Shao, Hang Dong, Tiantian Zheng, Pan Du, Shidong Jia, Bonnie King, Jing Wang, Xiaoran Liu, Huiping Li. Disease features, genomic profiles and outcomes of younger vs. older Chinese hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-10.

Focus on breast cancer.

Identification of effective and reliable biomarkers that could be used to predict the efficacy of endocrine therapy is of crucial importance to the management of oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC). KIF18A, a key regulator of cell cycle, is overexpressed in many human cancers, including BC. In this study, we investigated the role of KIF18A as a biomarker to predict the benefit from endocrine treatment in early ER + BC patients. KIF18A expression was assessed at the genomic level using the METABRIC dataset to explore its prognostic and predictive value in ER + BC patients (n = 1506). Predictive significance of KIF18A mRNA was validated using KM-Plot datasets (n = 2061). KIF18A protein expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry in a large annotated series of early-stage ER + BC (n = 1592) with long-term follow-up. High mRNA and protein expression of KIF18A were associated with short recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant-metastasis free survival (DMFS) and BC specific survival (all P < 0.05) in ER + BC in patients who received no adjuvant treatment or adjuvant endocrine therapy. In multivariate analysis, high KIF18A expression was an independent prognostic biomarker for poor RFS (P = 0.027) and DMFS (P = 0.028) in patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. KIF18A appears to be a candidate biomarker of a subgroup of ER + BC characterised by poor clinical outcome. High KIF18A expression has prognostic significance to predict poor benefit from endocrine treatment for patients with ER + BC. Therefore, measurement of KIF18A on ER + BC patients prior to treatment could guide clinician decision on benefit from endocrine therapy.

e13034 Background: The effect of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low expression on the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of HER2-low on the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer. Methods: We searched 10 databases and meeting minutes up to July 15, 2023, to identify studies that reported median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (OS) among HR+/HER2-low breast cancer patients and HER2-zero breast cancer patients receiving treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors. We calculated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 9 retrospective studies involving 1494 patients were included. HER2-low breast cancer patients accounted for 52.48% of the sample, and HER2-zero breast cancer patients accounted for 47.52% of the sample. The mPFS was significantly worse for HR+/HER2-low breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy than for HER2-zero breast cancer patients (risk ratio = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.15-1.44, p &lt; 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the median overall survival (mOS) between patients with HER2-low breast cancer and patients with HER2-zero breast cancer (risk ratio = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.69-1.66%, p = 0.78). The mPFS was significantly worse for HR+/HER2-low breast cancer patients receiving first-line treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (risk ratio = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.07-1.47, p = 0.0002). Conclusions: The mPFS of patients with advanced HER2-low breast cancer and first-line salvage patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy was significantly inferior to that observed in HER2-zero breast cancer patients. However, there were no discernible differences in the mOS between the two patient groups.