The Changing Profile of Academic Radiation Oncology Leaders: Updates over the Past Decade

Abstract

To report objective characteristics of program directors (PDs) and chairpersons and examine contemporary trends of their demographic and academic profiles from 2013 to 2023. We hypothesize that there are significant changes in the profiles of our radiation oncology leaders over the past decade. A total of 89 PDs and 85 chairpersons in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved residency programs in the U.S were queried for analysis. Demographic data on race, ethnicity, post graduate training, years in practice were obtained from publicly available online resources (e.g., institutional websites and online networking services for physicians). Variables on academic productivity and professional accolades included Hirsh-index, National Institute of Health (NIH) research grant (R), the ASTRO fellowship designation, and leadership positions in professional society meetings. Descriptive analyses, including Fisher's exact tests, were performed to compare findings from the published article in 2013 on this topic (Wilson LD et al. IJROBP 2013). A total of 36 out of 89 PDs (40.4%) and 11 out of 85 chairpersons (12.8%) were females, revealing higher proportion of females from the initial analysis: 40.4 vs. 24.1% for PDs (p = 0.025) and 12.8 vs. 9.2% for chairpersons (p = 0.618). 29 out of 89 (32.6%) PDs and 30 out of 85 (35.3%) chairpersons were non-White. The median length of practice for PDs and chairpersons were 11 and 29 years, respectively. 38 out of 89 PDs (42.7%) and 11 out of 85 (12.9%) chairpersons were employed at the institution of their training. 7 out of 89 (7.9%) for PDs and 51 out of 85 (60.0%) for chairpersons were awarded FASTRO designation. Median H-index showed increasing trends for PDs (14.5 vs 9) and chairpersons (40 vs 29) from the initial analysis. While most PDs and chairpersons are males, female representation has increased in radiation oncology leadership in the last 10 years, most notably among PDs. Academic productivity among our leaders has also increased. These trends highlight the changes in the landscape of our leadership characteristics.