Abstract
The law on flood and coastal defence is entering a period of fundamental change. Previously it was generally accepted that public bodies with flood defence responsibilities had permissive powers to undertake flood defence work, but were not subject to legal duties to do so. Individuals had no rights to protection against flooding, and no remedies were available where flood damage occurred due to inaction by flood defence authorities. These fundamental principles of flood defence law are being challenged upon two fronts. First, the civil law of private nuisance now recognises that those with control over land may be liable for an unreasonable failure to prevent flooding of neighbouring land. Second, human rights legislation has been interpreted to encompass a right to protection from flooding under some circumstances. There are considerable difficulties in reconciling these innovations with the traditional interpretation of the law, and there are fundamental questions to be addressed as to whether it is realistic to endorse an unqualified right to flood protection.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
