Abstract
Abstract This study examines the form of poems after Mashrouteh (constitutional revolution of Iran) and explains the literary-semantic function after having a brief look at the poetry in 40s and 50s. This essay aims to answer whether poesy gone through a lot of innovations and changes during years or the change and transition in its form and semantic has taken place gradually. The study looks possible answers whether there has been many innovations and transitions or a gradual change rarely in spite of the general tendency that poets seek innovation in different ways during the history of Persian poetry.
Highlights
It is difficult to define tradition due to its many meanings and connotations and it is difficult to choose one definition over another one
Innovation like tradition is a word with many meanings that is in contrast with the word tradition
Because even if by innovation we mean breaking from habit or defamiliarization, new rules are still needed
Summary
It is difficult to define tradition due to its many meanings and connotations and it is difficult to choose one definition over another one. The history of these changes is thoroughly collected in books related to this subject and infinite forms of poetry have appeared along with social transitions. Studying the metamorphosis of Persian poetry’s form the beginning up to now, can we conclude that all these changes and ups and downs are leading to a specific aim?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
