Abstract

ABSTRACTOne of the most central and novel features of the new climate governance architecture emerging from the 2015 Paris Agreement is the transparency framework committing countries to provide, inter alia, regular progress reports on national pledges to address climate change. Many countries will rely on public policies to turn their pledges into action. This article focuses on the EU’s experience with monitoring national climate policies in order to understand the challenges that are likely to arise as the Paris Agreement is implemented around the world. To do so, the research employs – for the first time – comparative empirical data submitted by states to the EU’s monitoring system. Our findings reveal how the EU’s predominantly technical interpretation of four international reporting quality criteria – an approach borrowed from reporting on GHG fluxes – has constrained knowledge production and stymied debate on the performance of individual climate policies. Key obstacles to more in-depth reporting include not only political concerns over reporting burdens and costs, but also struggles over who determines the nature of climate policy monitoring, the perceived usefulness of reporting information, and the political control that policy knowledge inevitably generates. Given the post-Paris drive to achieve greater transparency, the EU’s experience offers a sobering reminder of the political and technical challenges associated with climate policy monitoring, challenges that are likely to bedevil the Paris Agreement for decades to come.Policy relevanceThe 2009 Copenhagen summit ushered in a more bottom-up system of international climate governance. Such systems typically depend on strong monitoring approaches to assess past performance and estimate future national contributions over time. This article shows why decision makers at multiple governance levels should pay serious attention to empirical data on the experiences and challenges that have emerged around monitoring in the EU, a self-proclaimed climate leader. The analysis highlights key political and administrative challenges that policy makers will likely encounter in implementing climate policy monitoring and ensuring transparency in the spirit of the Paris Agreement.

Highlights

  • The 2015 Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2015) marked a shift towards a more bottom-up form of climate governance (Jordan et al, 2015), through which countries make emission reduction pledges known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)

  • Because many countries will rely on public policies to deliver on their NDCs, reporting will need to include information on policy performance

  • What lessons emerge from the EU’s experience? The first thing to note is that the Monitoring Mechanism has evolved in a situation of relatively high institutional trust and political buy-in; that is, the EU is a system where some aspects of reporting can be legally enforced and is a ‘more likely’ case of sophisticated policy monitoring

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 2015 Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2015) marked a shift towards a more bottom-up form of climate governance (Jordan et al, 2015), through which countries make emission reduction pledges known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). A focus on policies and measures – on which this article centres – only emerged in the late 2000s.2 Our analysis focuses on the challenges that have emerged as the EU has tried to construct a monitoring system that generates complete, consistent, comparable, and transparent data on climate policies.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.