Abstract

AbstractHome care for older people in England is commissioned through local authorities working predominantly with independent providers of care. Commissioners operate in a market model, planning and procuring home care services for local populations. Their role involves ‘managing’ and ‘shaping’ the market to ensure an adequate supply of care providers. Another imperative, emerging from the principles of personalisation, is the drive to achieve user outcomes rather than ‘time and task’ objectives. Little formal research has investigated the way commissioners reconcile these different requirements and organise commissioning. This study investigated commissioning approaches using qualitative telephone interviews with ten commissioners from different local authorities in England. The characteristics of commissioning were analysed thematically. Findings indicated (a) commissioning involved complex systems and processes, uniquely shaped for the local context, but frequently changed, suggesting a constant need for reframing commissioning arrangements; (b) partnerships with providers were mainly transactional, with occasional examples of collaborative models, that were considered to facilitate flexible services more appropriate for commissioning for personalised outcomes; and (c) only a small number of commissioners had attempted to reconcile the competing and incompatible goals of tightly prescribed contracting and working collaboratively with providers. A better understanding of flexible contracting arrangements and the hallmarks of a trusting collaboration is required to move beyond the procedural elements of contracting and commissioning.

Highlights

  • Policy and legislation relating to home care for older people in England sets out a strategy for the way services should be procured and delivered based on contracting between the public sector and independent providers (Department of Health and Social Care, 2018)

  • The motivation for the study stemmed from our engagement with commissioners in previous research that indicated that practice was diverse and prone to significant challenges (Chester, Hughes and Challis, 2010). Details of these challenges are rarely reported in the research literature and a better understanding of what commissioners are doing to resolve them, and how satisfied they are with the solutions, could support the development of more effective commissioning in the future, potentially fulfilling the imperative for person centred practice in home care delivery. This is set in the context of previous studies of commissioning to identify general issues relating to commissioning in public services and appraise studies investigating commissioning of home care for older people

  • The structural variation in commissioning arrangements was evident in both the number of providers they worked with, description of contract types and the combinations of contracting arrangements they employed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Policy and legislation relating to home care for older people in England sets out a strategy for the way services should be procured and delivered based on contracting between the public sector and independent providers (Department of Health and Social Care, 2018). The motivation for the study stemmed from our engagement with commissioners in previous research that indicated that practice was diverse and prone to significant challenges (Chester, Hughes and Challis, 2010) Details of these challenges are rarely reported in the research literature and a better understanding of what commissioners are doing to resolve them, and how satisfied they are with the solutions, could support the development of more effective commissioning in the future, potentially fulfilling the imperative for person centred practice in home care delivery. This is set in the context of previous studies of commissioning to identify general issues relating to commissioning in public services and appraise studies investigating commissioning of home care for older people.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.