Abstract
Imaging has revolutionized surgery over the last 50 years. Diagnostic imaging is a key tool for deciding to perform surgery during disease management; intraoperative imaging is one of the primary drivers for minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and postoperative imaging enables effective follow-up and patient monitoring. However, notably, there is still relatively little interchange of information or imaging modality fusion between these different clinical pathway stages. This book chapter provides a critique of existing augmented reality (AR) methods or application studies described in the literature using relevant examples. The aim is not to provide a comprehensive review, but rather to give an indication of the clinical areas in which AR has been proposed, to begin to explain the lack of clinical systems and to provide some clear guidelines to those intending pursue research in this area.KeywordsAugmented realityVirtual realityImage-guided surgeryNavigationStereotactic navigationDigital surgerySurgery 4.0
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.