Abstract

During the decade of the 1990s, health care reform, market forces, population needs, new knowledge in neuroscience and changes in advanced practice regulation provided the impetus for the development of the role of the psychiatric nurse practitioner. Debate about issues of role, scope of practice, educational preparation, titling, and credentialing for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse (APPN) of the future intensified as the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) proceeded with its controversial decision to develop a certification examination for the psychiatric nurse practitioner-in advance of consensus among advanced practice psychiatric nurses about those widely debated issues. Ironically, now that the ANCC adult and family psychiatric nurse practitioner (PMHNP) examinations exist, with test content outlines that clearly identify the professional standards and scope of practice relevant to the role of the certified psychiatric nurse practitioner, those contentious issues of role, scope of practice, educational preparation and credentialing (if not titling) seem considerably less thorny. In fact, by credentialing the role of the psychiatric nurse practitioner sooner rather than later, ANCC may have saved advanced practice psychiatric nursing for psychiatric nurses. This article proposes to (1). explain that assertion, (2). clarify what the scope of practice relevant to the newly certified role means in terms of credentialing requirements for existing types of psychiatric nurse practitioner, and (3). identify some of the controversies that linger with the debut of the PMHNP certification examination(s).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call