Abstract
Though both contraction of agonist muscles and co-contraction of antagonistic muscle pairs across the ankle joint are essential to postural stability, they are perceived to operate independently of each other, In an antagonistic setup, agonist muscles contract generating moment about the joint, while antagonist muscles contract generating stiffness across the joint. While both work together in maintaining robustness in the face of external perturbations, contractions of agonist muscles and co-contractions of antagonistic muscle pairs across the ankle joint play different roles in responding to and adapting to external perturbations. To determine their respective roles, we exposed participants to repeated perturbations in both large and small magnitudes. The center of pressure (COP) and a co-contraction index (CCI) were used to quantify the activation of agonist muscles and antagonistic muscle pairs across the ankle joint. Our results found that participants generated moment of a large magnitude across the ankle joint—a large deviation in the COP curve—in response to perturbations of a large magnitude (p <0.05), whereas the same participants generated higher stiffness about the ankle—a larger value in CCI—in response to perturbations of a small magnitude (p <0.05). These results indicate that participants use different postural strategies pertaining to circumstances. Further, the moment across the ankle decreased with repetitions of the same perturbation (p <0.05), and CCI tended to remain unchanged even in response to a different perturbation following repetition of the same perturbation (p <0.05). These findings suggest that ankle muscle contraction and co-contraction play different roles in regaining and maintaining postural stability. This study demonstrates that ankle moment and stiffness are not correlated in response to external perturbations.
Highlights
The center of pressure (COP) is a widely used indicator of neuromuscular control while standing [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
While COP is closely related to the ankle moment, it would be thought to be oversimplified if ankle stiffness is estimated from COP curves alone, in differentiating postural control with great stiffness from postural control without great stiffness
In Trial 9, COP Excursion I decreased from the same values in Trial 8 with a larger slope during Sequence 1 in comparison with Trial 8 from Trial 7, while COP Excursion I increased from Trial 8 to Trial 9 during Sequence 2
Summary
The center of pressure (COP) is a widely used indicator of neuromuscular control while standing [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. COP is closely proportional to the moment about the ankle joint that is generated by the musculoskeletal system governing the ankle [1, 8, 9]. It is questionable whether stiffness associated with the ankle joint can be predicted using COP curves alone while recovering balance after external perturbations. Ankle stiffness is predominantly related to muscle co-contractions, that is, simultaneous activities of antagonistic muscle pairs across the joint, when postural stability is threatened [11,12,13]. In a joint system under an antagonistic setup, the moment generated from the contraction of agonist muscles is not linearly related to the co-contractions of the antagonistic muscle pairs about the joint [8, 14,15,16]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.