Abstract

Vitamin D has been associated with a variety of human complex traits and diseases in observational studies, but a causal relationship remains unclear. To examine a putative causal effect of vitamin D across phenotypic domains and disease categories, we conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using genetic instruments associated with circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations. We leveraged genome-wide significant 25(OH)D-associated SNPs (N = 138) from a meta-analysis combining a vitamin D GWAS conducted in 401,460 white British UK Biobank (UKBB) participants and an independent vitamin D GWAS including 42,274 samples of European ancestry, and examined 190 large-scale health-related GWAS spanning a broad spectrum of complex traits, diseases and biomarkers. We applied multiple MR methods to estimate the causal effect of vitamin D while testing and controlling for potential biases from horizontal pleiotropy. Consistent with previous findings, genetically predicted increased 25(OH)D levels significantly decreased the risk of multiple sclerosis (OR = 0.824; 95% CI 0.689–0.986). The protective effect estimate was consistent across different MR methods and four different multiple sclerosis GWAS with varying sample sizes and genotyping platforms. On the contrary, we found limited evidence in support of a causal effect of 25(OH)D on anthropometric traits, obesity, cognitive function, sleep behavior, breast and prostate cancer, and autoimmune, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurological and psychiatric traits and diseases, and blood biomarkers. Our results may inform ongoing and future randomized clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation.

Highlights

  • Vitamin D has been associated with a variety of human complex traits and diseases in observational studies, but a causal relationship remains unclear

  • Using summary statistics from a study based on Immunochip conducted in 2013, we showed that increased 25(OH)D level decreased the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) (MR-PRESSO odds ratio [OR] = 0.433; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.313–0.599; P = 4.19 × 10–7; ­PFDR = 7.96 × 10–5)

  • This result was consistent across different Mendelian randomization (MR) methods (MREgger: OR = 0.390 [0.258–0.588]; weighted median: OR = 0.397 [0.301–0.523]) and was in line with previous findings (Table 1a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vitamin D has been associated with a variety of human complex traits and diseases in observational studies, but a causal relationship remains unclear. We leveraged genome-wide significant 25(OH)D-associated SNPs (N = 138) from a meta-analysis combining a vitamin D GWAS conducted in 401,460 white British UK Biobank (UKBB) participants and an independent vitamin D GWAS including 42,274 samples of European ancestry, and examined 190 large-scale health-related GWAS spanning a broad spectrum of complex traits, diseases and biomarkers. One of the latest GWAS of circulating 25(OH)D, conducted by metaanalyzing a GWAS of 401,460 white British UK Biobank (UKBB) participants and a GWAS of 42,274 samples of European ancestry, has identified 138 conditionally independent SNPs in 69 vitamin D associated l­oci[13] These genetic discoveries have enabled causal inference between vitamin D and complex traits through Mendelian randomization (MR), an approach that correlates genetic variants randomly distributed at conception (instrumental variables, IVs) with health outcomes later ­on[15]. The rapid accumulation of GWAS summary statistics for human complex traits and diseases has allowed us to assess the causal effect of vitamin D across a broad spectrum of health-related outcomes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call