Abstract
Abstract This chapter focuses on issues raised in the first reviews of Kant’s first two books in moral philosophy. Of special interest are the reviews of the Groundwork and Critique of Practical Reason by Herman Andreas Pistorius, the first published quickly in 1786 while the second, although apparently written in timely fashion, did not appear until 1794. Pistorius developed the charge that the categorical imperative is an “empty formalism,” and more generally argued that a conception of what is right must presuppose an account of the good, and that morality must be founded on the recognition that happiness is the natural end of human beings, not merely an incidental object of morality. Kant’s amplification of the conception of the highest good in the Critique of Practical Reason is already a response to Pistorius’s criticism of the Groundwork, while the “empty formalism” objection would be repeated by Hegel in both 1802 and 1821, and by many since.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.