The case study: the law of the World Trade Organization

Abstract

We can sit down and look at the realistic possibility of making the WTO work for the whole world. We should be realistic. We shouldn't be kidding ourselves that the WTO is all right at the moment. It's not all right. In this chapter, we make a first attempt to posit WTO law in the wider context of public international law. The sources of WTO law are summed up and some of the special features of WTO law, of particular importance to conflict of norms, are examined. WTO law as ‘just’ another branch of public international law For WTO law to be a relevant example in this study on conflict of norms in public international law, it should be established first that WTO law is, indeed, part of public international law. With one possible exception, no academic author, WTO decision or document disputes that WTO rules are part of the wider corpus of public international law. Like international environmental law and human rights law, WTO law is ‘just’ a branch of public international law. To public international lawyers, my call in the April 2000 issue of the American Journal of International Law for WTO rules to ‘be considered as creating international legal obligations that are part of public international law’ is a truism. As one author noted in response: ‘It is difficult … to envisage any other possible status for rules emanating from a treaty concluded among States under international law, as the WTO Agreement.’