Abstract

The current official position on compulsory mediation in England and Wales is that the courts do not have the power to compel parties to mediate but can impose cost sanctions on parties who unreasonably refuse to mediate. Nevertheless, the courts in England and Wales have ordered parties to mediate. Additionally, the courts’ application of the Halsey factors in deciding when a party’s refusal to mediate will be deemed unreasonable, has arguably created a body of divergent case law. This article argues that mediation should be made compulsory for civil disputes in England and Wales to remedy the existing state of uncertainty.

Highlights

  • The current official position on compulsory mediation in England and Wales is that the courts cannot compel parties to mediate, but can impose cost sanctions on those who unreasonably refuse to mediate

  • The courts’ inconsistency on when a party’s refusal to mediate will be deemed unreasonable has arguably created a body of divergent case law

  • This article argues that express compulsory mediation should be introduced in the English civil justice system to remedy the existing state of uncertainty

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current official position on compulsory mediation in England and Wales is that the courts cannot compel parties to mediate, but can impose cost sanctions on those who unreasonably refuse to mediate.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.