Abstract
A legal-like format is employed in this article to put intelligence testing in early intervention “on trial”. Six major presumptions that underlie the use of early intelligence tests are presented and disputed. The concerns center on the construct of early intelligence, reliability, prediction, standardized administration, professional acceptability, utility for decision making, and congruence with P.L. 99--457. Logic and evidence are marshaled to refute each presumption. In the summation and closing arguments, we urge professional solidarity in opposing the continued unwarranted use of intelligence testing in early intervention.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
