Abstract

The UK Government has grappled with the issue of excessive directors' remuneration for many years with limited success; corporate governance initiatives, such as advisory shareholder votes on DRRs, have tended to be rarely used and hindered by economic and social obstacles. In the light of the BIS proposal to increase the impact of the shareholder vote on DRRs from advisory to binding, as set out in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill 2012, which has since received Royal Assent and become the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013; this paper seeks to analyse the feasibility of the said reforms. The paper firstly finds numerous vital economic and social factors at play that drive directors' remuneration up. This is followed by a finding consistent with many academics that, despite a recent spate in dissenting votes by shareholders on remuneration packages, shareholders lack the requisite information, knowledge, and motivation to use a binding vote to meaningfully reform remuneration trends. The paper also finds that due to the close relationship that employees often share with their respective companies codetermination, akin to that which is famously used in Germany, has merit within the remuneration committees of UK PLCs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.