Abstract
The fifth ministerial conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO) collapsed in Cancun. Three sets of factors are postulated to explain the breakdown. First, there were ideological conflicts between mercantilism and liberalism, and between the three pillars of sustainable development: the economic, the social, and the environmental. The erosion of the linkage between liberalism and mercantilism in the compromise of embedded liberalism — as well as weak or absent linkages between the sustainable development goals — was also problematic in the Doha Development Agenda negotiations. Second, changing power relations and priorities among the WTO member states were evident in Cancun. Among others, the newly emerged Group of 21 for agricultural negotiations with the support of civil-society groups was a notable development. Third, there were institutional and domestic constraints in the negotiation structure. The Cancun breakdown poses a serious challenge for WTO negotiations, multilateralism, and global governance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
