Abstract

BackgroundThe Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is an ongoing, global, community-driven effort to evaluate and improve the computational annotation of protein function.ResultsHere, we report on the results of the third CAFA challenge, CAFA3, that featured an expanded analysis over the previous CAFA rounds, both in terms of volume of data analyzed and the types of analysis performed. In a novel and major new development, computational predictions and assessment goals drove some of the experimental assays, resulting in new functional annotations for more than 1000 genes. Specifically, we performed experimental whole-genome mutation screening in Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aureginosa genomes, which provided us with genome-wide experimental data for genes associated with biofilm formation and motility. We further performed targeted assays on selected genes in Drosophila melanogaster, which we suspected of being involved in long-term memory.ConclusionWe conclude that while predictions of the molecular function and biological process annotations have slightly improved over time, those of the cellular component have not. Term-centric prediction of experimental annotations remains equally challenging; although the performance of the top methods is significantly better than the expectations set by baseline methods in C. albicans and D. melanogaster, it leaves considerable room and need for improvement. Finally, we report that the CAFA community now involves a broad range of participants with expertise in bioinformatics, biological experimentation, biocuration, and bio-ontologies, working together to improve functional annotation, computational function prediction, and our ability to manage big data in the era of large experimental screens.

Highlights

  • High-throughput nucleic acid sequencing [1] and massspectrometry proteomics [2] have provided us with a deluge of data for DNA, RNA, and proteins in diverse species

  • Top methods have improved from CAFA2 to CAFA3, but improvement was less dramatic than from CAFA1 to CAFA2 One of Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA)’s major goals is to quantify the progress in function prediction over time

  • We conducted a comparative evaluation of top CAFA1, CAFA2, and CAFA3 methods according to their ability to predict Gene Ontology [28] terms on a set of common benchmark proteins

Read more

Summary

Introduction

High-throughput nucleic acid sequencing [1] and massspectrometry proteomics [2] have provided us with a deluge of data for DNA, RNA, and proteins in diverse species. To address the growing gap between high-throughput data and deep biological insight, a variety of computational methods that predict protein function have been developed over the years [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] This explosion in the number of methods is accompanied by the need to understand how well they perform, and what improvements are needed to satisfy the needs of the life sciences community. The Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) is an ongoing, global, community-driven effort to evaluate and improve the computational annotation of protein function

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call