The Cadbury Schweppes Judgment and Its Implications on Profit Shifting Activities within Europe

Abstract

In 2006, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided with the Cadbury Schweppes judgment that European Controlled-Foreign-Company (CFC) rules infringe the principle of freedom of establishment and restricted the applicability thereof. This paper analyzes the impact of mandatory amendments to European CFC rules on tax planning activities within Europe. Using a difference-in-differences approach, my results provide robust evidence that pre-tax earnings of subsidiaries located in European low-tax jurisdictions have increased by around 10 % after the Cadbury Schweppes judgment. My analysis shows further that the increase of pre-tax earnings is related to facilitated profit shifting activities. Multinational corporations with high incentives or enhanced profit shifting opportunities react more pronounced to the Cadbury Schweppes judgment. The findings point out that CFC rules became less effective and thus, profit shifting activities within Europe are less restricted after the ECJ judgment. Additional tests suggest further that on average 90 % of the increase in pre-tax earnings is attributable to strategic transfer pricing determination, while less than 10 % is attributable to debt shifting activities.